|
Inlägg #1: Postat: 2002-10-14 16:17:00
|
|
Rainer |
Läs vad sprängämnesexperten van Romero hade att säga om WTC-demoleringen:
Länk: thepowerhour.com
Within hours Romero was telling the Albuquerque Journal that the collapse of the twin towers could have been caused by a small amount of explosive put in more than two points in each of the towers. |
| |
|
Inlägg #2: Postat: 2002-10-14 16:18:00
|
|
Rainer |
"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.
And Romero should know. After all Van is a demolition expert and a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies the effects of explosions on buildings.
|
| |
|
Inlägg #3: Postat: 2002-10-14 16:18:00
|
|
Rainer |
Nevertheless, ten days later Romero had changed his mind. Not only that, but the Albuquerque Journal changed their story too. They altered the original web page about Romeros views. It now shows his revised views first.
Här lite fler länkar, förutom dom som jag angett i artkeln:
Länk: emperors-clothes.com
Länk: world-action.co.uk |
| |
|
Inlägg #4: Postat: 2002-10-14 16:22:00
|
|
Michael Bärlin |
Tja, det framgår ju fortfarande inte ur artikeln varför det är mer troligt med bomber som då måste ha placerats på just de våningsplan som råkade drabbas av flygplanen än den naturliga förklaring som ges av husens sårbara konstruktion.
|
| |
|
Inlägg #5: Postat: 2002-10-14 16:37:00
|
|
Rainer |
Läs igenom följande artikel noggrant, så fattar du varför det enda troliga är just bomber:
Länk: nerdcities.com |
| |