dekonstruktion

Inlägg #1: Postat: 2002-05-07 12:59:00
Frederik
One choice is of course to question everything, but thats more like choosing not to choose. With logic I can prove anything. But the important things in life cannot be grasped with rationalisations. They can only be achieved through commitment and choice. And that they are important can only be fully understood once I get there. And for the to get there part deconstructivism doesnt feel like a very...er... constructive approach. Anyway, thanks for an interesting text. Got me thinking...
Inlägg #2: Postat: 2002-05-07 20:40:00
annakarin
the complete deconstruction idea is a killing idea. i dont know whether its about choosing not to chose or questioning uncertainties, but i do know that when i first got in touch with it, it was like hearing someone explain my own attitude towards life and reality. im glad you like the text - even though it is, by definition, non-existing and basically untrue. of course ;
Inlägg #3: Postat: 2002-05-07 20:41:00
annakarin
but youre right. deconstructions not a constructive approach when it comes to living. not if its happiness one seeks, anyways.
Inlägg #4: Postat: 2002-05-08 17:37:00
Frederik
True. The problem with happiness is that in order to enjoy it one must be willing to bear the risk of losing it again. And the advantage with deconstructivism, it seems, is that theres nothing to win and nothing to lose. Anyway, just one more though. As you can see I chose to assume that your comments were existing, sos I could then choose to commit myself to writing a reply... :
Inlägg #5: Postat: 2002-05-08 17:37:00
Frederik
True. The problem with happiness is that in order to enjoy it one must be willing to bear the risk of losing it again. And the advantage with deconstructivism, it seems, is that theres nothing to win and nothing to lose. Anyway, just one more though. As you can see I chose to assume that your comments were existing, sos I could then choose to commit myself to writing a reply... :
Laddar...