Valt inlägg:
Concerning science: the objectivity of science is worth a debate in itself, but it *is* based on certain conventions none of which are to be found in your interpretation of which as far as I can judge and it wields a big authority in our society. Why otherwise would you have bothered to mention it in your review of GBs book?
Ett meddelande kommer att skickas till ansvarig som besultar om inlägget skall tas bort, av vilken anledning vill du rapportera det här inlägget?